Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

House Passes Bill to Completely Ban Taxpayer Funding of Abortions
lifenews.com ^ | 1/22/15 | Steven Ertelt

Posted on 01/22/2015 10:37:12 AM PST by Morgana

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 01/22/2015 10:37:12 AM PST by Morgana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Interested to learn which Republican currently supports tax-payer funding of abortion—i.e., wants to make you and me pay for abortions.


2 posted on 01/22/2015 10:40:44 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Where can we see the list of those who voted FOR this?


3 posted on 01/22/2015 10:45:26 AM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo....Sum Pro Vita - Modified Descartes)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Important as this particular issue is, there is an underlying much more general one which permeates government and our entire society.

Where is it written in the Constitution that any activity or “service” which is not illegal should be funded by the taxpayer?

It’s not against the law, I want it, ipso facto the “government” should pay for it.


4 posted on 01/22/2015 10:45:27 AM PST by ChildOfThe60s (If you can remember the 60s, you weren't really there....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

But what happened to the part that banned all abortions after the age of 20 weeks? (when the baby can feel pain) They seemed to drop that part, so that it is still OK to torture and abort them, the Feds are just not going to pay for it.


5 posted on 01/22/2015 10:46:22 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cicero

Looks like it was Hanna of New York...


6 posted on 01/22/2015 10:47:43 AM PST by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy, and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2015/roll045.xml#N


7 posted on 01/22/2015 10:48:39 AM PST by Repeal The 17th (We have met the enemy, and he is us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

How much money are they going to continue to give to Planned Parenthood, and other wicked organizations like it, under the guise of “family planning”?


8 posted on 01/22/2015 10:49:34 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

I’d like to see the bill. Do you have a link?


9 posted on 01/22/2015 10:50:27 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana
"This legislation prohibits taxpayer funding of elective abortions, no matter where in the federal system that might occur."

When mentioning "federal system", are they talking about abortions performed in federally run/funded facilities or are they talking about funding mechanisms?

If PP is not considered part of the "federal system" mentioned here then, although this is a step in the right direction, it does not go far enough in stripping those ghouls of funding.

10 posted on 01/22/2015 10:51:19 AM PST by SZonian (Throwing our allegiances to political parties in the long run gave away our liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Since they know that Obama would never sign such a bill, I can only conclude the reason for doing this is to give the Dems the ability to shout “Republicans want to ban abortions!” from the rooftops, thereby giving Hillary an edge in 2016.


11 posted on 01/22/2015 10:53:22 AM PST by Cementjungle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

From another thread...

pro-lifers are also planning a protest outside the offices of GOP House member Renee Ellmers, who led the move to pull the vote on a bill that would ban abortions past 20 weeks.

The news broke last night, that after pressure from some female representatives in the House, Republicans have tabled an expected vote on the Pain Capable Unborn Child Protection Act, which would ban abortion after 20 weeks. The bill, is supported by a majority of Republican members and all but six GOP members voted for the measure when it came before the House in 2013.

The bill’s sponsor, Rep. Trent Franks had planned on the vote coming today because of the abortion law anniversary.

In a closed-door open-mic session of House Republicans, North Carolina Rep. Renee Ellmers led the effort to pull the pro-life law telling the conference that she believes the bill will cost the party support among millennials, reports the National Journal.


12 posted on 01/22/2015 10:56:02 AM PST by afraidfortherepublic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

It still won’t get 60 votes in the senate.


13 posted on 01/22/2015 10:57:35 AM PST by Beagle8U (NOTICE : Unattended children will be given Coffee and a Free Puppy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Thats crazy, there are NO tax payer funded abortions, Rep. Stupak held his ground and was assured that abortions were off the table, …remember? /sarc

PS: Its not my job to keep score, but I am confident that there is a special place in HELL for that piece of sh1t BART STUPAK ( D) Michigan


14 posted on 01/22/2015 11:01:31 AM PST by DanielRedfoot (Creepy Ass Cracker)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Given that in most cases, abortion is an elective, not a necessary medical procedure I can’t understand why any insurance (government or otherwise) program would pay for it. I mean, they don’t pay for nose jobs, do they? Just MHO!


15 posted on 01/22/2015 11:01:57 AM PST by Phlap (REDNECK@LIBARTS.EDU)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

Nice kabuki theater.

Meaningless.


16 posted on 01/22/2015 11:03:09 AM PST by chris37 (heartless)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Beagle8U
Hmmm...I wonder.

I didn't think so either but now I wonder. Who will be the Democrats who will run in the next election on voting FOR federal dollars to be spent on abortion?

I think there may be enough blue dogs to get to sixty.

17 posted on 01/22/2015 11:04:33 AM PST by what's up
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

It’s a lawless, immoral, unconstitutional bill anyway.

It grants explicit permission in the law to murder babies, ALL OF THEM, as long as it is done on schedule and by their rules.

God says, “you shall not murder.” No exceptions.

And the Constitution absolutely requires equal protection for the right to life of every person, in every jurisdiction. No exceptions.


18 posted on 01/22/2015 11:12:53 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Morgana

If it doesn’t stop giving money to Planned Parenthood, it is an empty gesture.


19 posted on 01/22/2015 11:13:41 AM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Good Muslims, like good Nazis or good liberals, are terrible human beings.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: afraidfortherepublic

I was referring in my last post to the “fetal pain” bill, by the way.

I can’t say whether this defunding bill is a good bill until I actually see its provisions.


20 posted on 01/22/2015 11:14:15 AM PST by EternalVigilance
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson