Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ethrane

I respectfully disagree.

But, every time I brought quality control to an operation I heard about every one in a thousand exception, and how the statistics did not represent “THEIR” workplace.

As conservatives, we want the government to control expenses and cut down on incompetence. But when they try to DI it you cry.

How would you establish controls to make sure the Medicare taxes you have been paying for fifty years are spent on improved patient outcomes.


53 posted on 01/25/2015 6:01:36 AM PST by Vermont Lt (Ebola: Death is a lagging indicator.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies ]


To: Vermont Lt

You can respectfully disagree, I got no argument there.

But the Government is NOT instituting these ‘quality control’ measures based on any science at all. Nothing they have demanded to ‘meet standards; is means tested or validated. It is purely economical.

Go research the most recent recommended ‘standards’ re: blood glucose control in peri-op CABG patients, published less than a few months ago...which they promptly and recently threw out as they realized that more patients were being harmed by hospitals trying to comply with their ‘standards’ so the standard was ditched in short order...before any stats were evident or published.

How can you trust an entity that has a HUGE financial interest in the process setting the standards that will determine the payment for that service? Seriously?


55 posted on 01/30/2015 6:59:10 PM PST by Ethrane ("obsta principiis")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson