Well, what else can one suppose of Rolling Stone? Unbiased reporting?
The author exemplifies what is wrong with today’s men; a lack of responsibility and sense of duty. I would expect this author to be a metrosexual living in the comfort afforded him by manly men. He’s also very liberal, anti-war and failing to grasp the terrors awaiting America. Time spent on the movie is about zilch and he certainly failed to grasp the themes therein.
> Well, what else can one suppose of Rolling Stone? Unbiased reporting?
It’s like reading newly released WH unemployment figures. You know it’s going to be skewed, full of lies, and full of crap provided by a liberal 0 supporter.
From RS and Matt Taibbi it’s guaranteed to be a hit piece.
I haven’t seen the movie,
Rolling Stone is mostly dreck wrapped up with sugar coated music news to make the leftist medicine go down more favorably, (and did they ever revolve that whole rape/frat house controversy, i haven’t kept up?)
As is often the case, because some article is just a name with lengthy paragraphs following it in a glossy magazine, the words somehow get elevated to some sort of serious intellectual unbiased commentary where we have to remember to filter or be influenced. Where if you’ve met or actually seen some of these ‘reporters’ up close and in person (and I’m suspecting this person is no less an example) you’d never let them near your front door or even allow them to stop and pet your dog on the sidewalk,