Posted on 01/28/2015 4:39:36 PM PST by 2ndDivisionVet
The field will be crowded. The stakes could not be any higher. So how will Ted Cruz fare in 2016? Jim Antle looks into his crystal ball...
Donald Trump, Sarah Palin and Ted Cruz all went to Iowa. This is not the set-up of a joke, but the beginning of the 2016 presidential race.
All three are conservative celebrities; the first two are celebrities even in the broader sense. Having any of them at your conservative gathering excites attendees and generates media attention. All three say they are mulling runs for the White House.
Cruz is obviously different from Trump and Palin in many important ways. The senator from Texas is a current officeholder. Trump has never been elected dog catcher, and Palin is a long way from her days as governor of Alaska.
Cruz's appearance at the Iowa Freedom Summit received rave reviews, while Palin's was widely panned. In fact, the 2008 vice-presidential nominee is being criticized in conservative circles in ways that once seemed unthinkable.
Obviously, Cruz is much smarter than either Trump or Palin. And he's far likelier to actually run for president than either of them. Virtually no one takes Trump or Palin 2016 talk seriously anymore.
But Cruz does share one problem with Palin and Trump. Mama Grizzly and the eccentric billionaire are able to exert some influence over the process by threatening to run, but if either of them took the plunge and did poorly, it would hurt their reputations as people who represent grassroots conservatives.
Michele Bachmann was a Tea Party superstar until her presidential campaign fizzled. Now she's not even in Congress. Bob Dornan was always more of a gadfly, but something similar happened to him after his even more disastrous 1996 presidential campaign.
George W. Bush was quoted dismissing the conservative movement by saying, "I whupped Gary Bauer's ass in 2000." Bauer is still an important conservative activist, but his ill-fated presidential campaign definitely made him seem less representative of the religious right.
Cruz is still a freshman senator. A lot of his influence in that chamber stems from the perception that he speaks for a lot of conservatives. But he clearly doesn't want to stick around as long as past conservative boat-rockers like Jesse Helms, nor does he want to drop out of electoral politics like Jim DeMint or Tom Coburn.
Lots of Republicans, and even many conservatives, disagreed with Cruz's defund-Obamacare strategy. This was especially the case after the government shutdown briefly turned public opinion against the GOP. But large segments of the conservative base appreciated that Cruz was fighting for them at a time when so many other GOP leaders seemed ready to fold.
When Cruz looks at 2016, he likely thinks of two other presidential elections. One is 1980. Ronald Reagan bonded with conservative activists during the fight against the Panama Canal treaty. Republican leaders like Howard Baker and even eminent conservatives like William F. Buckley, Jr. thought Reagan was wrong. He also failed to stop the treaty.
Reagan was nevertheless the conservative movement's choice and a two-term Republican president of the United States. He is still revered on the right to this day and is now grudgingly accepted by some liberals in the pantheon of great 20th-century presidents.
The other election Cruz is looking at is 2004. Bush's reelection campaign team concentrated on turning out the conservative base, rather than fighting John Kerry for a small slice of independent voters. The election was close, but their bet paid off.
Cruz is a purer conservative than Bush, a president whose legacy included the Medicare prescription-drug benefit and No Child Left Behind. But he has to get to the general election before he can try to replicate Karl Rove's fall campaign strategy.
The big question for Cruz is whether he has the state-by-state organization to go the distance. Currently, most observers suspect the answer is no. But perhaps he can build one on the fly.
To win the nomination, Cruz will not only have to battle establishment heavyweights like Jeb Bush, Chris Christie and Mitt Romney (should they all run), but he's also likely going to have to emerge from a crowded field of conservatives that may include Rand Paul, Marco Rubio, Scott Walker, Mike Pence, Bobby Jindal, Ben Carson and who knows how many other people as the year progresses.
Some of those potential candidates have supporters and donors that will overlap with Cruz's. Can the Texas senator not only bring crowds in Iowa to their feet, but also win over the financial backers and campaign professionals he'll need to help him translate the applause into votes? What happens to Cruz's reputation as a conservative dynamo if he can't?
Ted Cruz may be willing to take that risk.
The one who left office with 600 000 dead and 1/3 of the country destroyed?
You cannot name a single first-term US Senator elevated to the Presidency who did not make a mess of things due to lack of executive ability.So, all of these US Senators made a mess of things due to a lack of executive ability, including James Monroe(Remember the Monroe Doctrine?) and John Quincy Adams?
To date, sixteen senators have also served as president of the United States. Three senators, Warren G. Harding, John F. Kennedy, and Barack Obama moved directly from the U.S. Senate to the White House.
(Photo: Warren G. Harding. Senate Historical Office)
-----------------------------------------------------
Senator, 1790-1794
President, 1817-1825
-----------------------------------------------------
Senator, 1803-1808
President, 1825-1829
-----------------------------------------------------
Andrew Jackson
Senator, 1797-1798; 1823-1825
President, 1829-1837
-----------------------------------------------------
Martin Van Buren
Senator, 1821-1828
President, 1837-1841
-----------------------------------------------------
William Henry Harrison
Senator, 1825-1828
President, 1841
-----------------------------------------------------
John Tyler
Senator, 1827-1836
President, 1841-1845
-----------------------------------------------------
Franklin Pierce
Senator, 1837-1842
President, 1853-1857
-----------------------------------------------------
James Buchanan
Senator, 1834-1845
President, 1857-1861
-----------------------------------------------------
Andrew Johnson
Senator, 1857-1862; 1875
President, 1865-1869
-----------------------------------------------------
Benjamin Harrison
Senator, 1881-1887
President, 1889-1893
-----------------------------------------------------
Warren G. Harding
Senator, 1915-1921
President, 1921-1923
-----------------------------------------------------
Harry S. Truman
Senator, 1935-1945
President, 1945-1953
-----------------------------------------------------
John F. Kennedy
Senator, 1953-1960
President, 1961-1963
-----------------------------------------------------
Lyndon B. Johnson
Senator, 1949-1961
President, 1963-1969
-----------------------------------------------------
Richard M. Nixon
Senator, 1950-1953
President, 1969-1974
-----------------------------------------------------
Barack Obama
Senator, 2005-2008
President, 2009- present
Wrong.
I love social conservatives. I have posted here, many times, that the country would be much better for myself, my children, and my grandchildren, if they were in charge.
You may be confused because I have also posted that social conservatives have demonstrated that they can lose elections, but they have yet to demonstrate that they can win elections.
This is not to be overlooked in choosing a candidate.
Let’s just say that your posting history indicates a powerful dislike for conservatives, aka, social conservatives.
Ross Perot and Ron Paul are nutcases.
Harding, Kennedy, and Obama.
Not what I would call a recommendation.
Cruz/Walker or Walk/Cruz.
“Obviously, Cruz is much smarter than either Trump or Palin...”
You are objectively intellectually bankrupt and an abject failure at merely living...
They’d have my vote and campaign time.
Dude, what’d I do? LOKL
Which candidate were you supporting in 1860?
Guy is an intellectual hack and demonstrates as much by resorting the old democratic and adolscelent assailing of intellect.
Trump is a billionaire and a graduate of Wharton.
Palin’s talents are well enough known and numerous, so I am not compelled to write her biography.
Besides, it’s not as if the author is a rocket scientist, so he isn’t qualified to measure, objectively or quantitatively, on a bell curve or a stated and accepted standard as to whom is smart or smarter than another...
What state was he governor of? How much property does he own? Where is his TV show?
Some Lincoln quotes:
I have no purpose directly or indirectly to interfere with the institution of slavery in the states where it exists. I believe I have no lawful right to do so, and I have no inclination to do so.
I have no purpose to introduce political and social equality between the white and black races. There is physical difference between the two which, in my judgment, will probably forever forbid their living together upon the footing of perfect equality, and inasmuch as it becomes a necessity that there must be a difference, I, as well as Judge Douglas, am in favor of the race to which I belong having the superior position.
Our republican system was meant for a homogeneous people. As long as blacks continue to live with the whites they constitute a threat to the national life. Family life may also collapse and the increase of mixed breed bastards may some day challenge the supremacy of the white man.
There is a natural disgust in the minds of nearly all white people to the idea of indiscriminate amalgamation of the white and black races ... A separation of the races is the only perfect preventive of amalgamation, but as an immediate separation is impossible, the next best thing is to keep them apart where they are not already together. If white and black people never get together in Kansas, they will never mix blood in Kansas ...
Zactly
IoW’s, he’s a retarded ass...
Whoa.. that sure the hell wasn’t in my history books.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.