To: Kaslin
That is an outcome of the deal made between him and Bush. It is better for the Gopes if there is only one major gope running. He can lay back in the early primaries and use his cash shotgun to destroy the conservative candidates one by one while not contending in his own right, Then in the later primaries when the conservatives are all dropped out or too muddy for the voters, he will win as the last man standing. Then in November he will give it to the Democrat whomever that might be. The Democrats know this and will not worry about electability but will front the most ideologically fanatic candidate they have.
That, of course, assumes we make it to the end of the Sultan's official term.
9 posted on
01/30/2015 10:04:53 AM PST by
arthurus
(It's true!)
To: arthurus
A very likely scenario....
13 posted on
01/30/2015 10:07:49 AM PST by
indthkr
To: arthurus
I like the way you think.
18 posted on
01/30/2015 10:12:31 AM PST by
Nucluside
(ready)
To: arthurus
Exactly. More proof of GOP(e) collusion
19 posted on
01/30/2015 10:12:45 AM PST by
catfish1957
(Everything I needed to know about Islam was written on 11 Sep 2001)
To: arthurus
All it was ever about, was clearing the board for Jeb. Now, Jeb SHOULD have been running for President in 2000, but at the time, he had only two years as Florida governor to his credit, and he was considered to be “not ready” for the move.
History moves on some hidden pivot points at times, and we do not know what those points were until long after the fact. McCain and Romney were both less than enthusiastic about becoming the counterweights to an extremely important pivot in history, in which it was determined that the decay of the governing principles that had guided the territory once known as “the United States of America” should proceed without impediment.
30 posted on
01/30/2015 10:32:39 AM PST by
alloysteel
(The Internet is like an icy sidewalk. One slip, and BOOM!, down you go)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson