[WayneS]

That means that if it is around 1/4 acre in size, then it is a maximum of 160’ long.

Depending upon the orientation and construction of the shooting range, that’s still kind of tight - and it appears his quality of construction id defintitely lacking.

[ClearCase_guy]

So, I've posted a number of comments to this thread supporting the guy's basic right to build a gun range. I would like to caveat that, and I will admit that sub-standard construction and poor implementation of something like a gun range is not acceptable. Maybe he is a fool.

But my point has always been about Principle. On a daily basis, I see people who ostensibly believe in limited government, yet they constantly point and say "I don't like that -- there ought to be a law!"

Some laws have value. I am not an anarchist. I am not a Libertarian. But I like limited government. And, as a general statement of Principle, I don't want my neighbors to control how I live. And when I say "neighbor", I don't me the guy whose house I can see through the trees. I basically mean You. Or Harry Reid.

But, yes, a patently unsafe gun range would seem to be a bad choice in a tightly packed community.

[driftdiver]

Do a search for the neighbors name on http://www.pcpao.org/ County Property records. You can see the lots here.