Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: wbarmy

The health department’s argument was that having more children put her health and life at risk. Like you I will reserve judgment without more information. If this woman does not have the cognitive ability to understand the health risks that further pregnancies could bring, they may have a case. I would need to know what those “serious health risks” are.

Many women in America can’t say no. Look at our welfare rolls. This is not justification for involuntary sterilization. Sexual intercourse with a person who is a ward of the state or has a guardian due to diminished mental capacity would be rape and the offender (s) should be charged and prosecuted.

I am a former public health nurse myself, and different children from different fathers is the norm these days. Involuntary sterilization won’t change the culture that promotes fornication with whomever is around at the moment.


12 posted on 02/04/2015 9:23:41 AM PST by longfellowsmuse (last of the living nomads)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: longfellowsmuse

The solution is to cut the welfare rolls and not to infringe upon people’s inherent freedoms...


14 posted on 02/04/2015 9:39:52 AM PST by GraceG (Protect the Border from Illegal Aliens, Don't Protect Illegal Alien Boarders...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: longfellowsmuse
Many women in America can’t say no.

I disagree with that statement. It is not that they can't say no, they WON'T say no, because there is no fiscal or moral reason to.

The woman we are discussing really seems to be unable to SAY no, and it is rape.
16 posted on 02/04/2015 9:43:30 AM PST by wbarmy (I chose to be a sheepdog once I saw what happens to the sheep.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson