Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ransomed

It should be recirculated not wasted. Maybe something else going on who knows.


15 posted on 02/04/2015 10:08:40 PM PST by Hoosier-Daddy ("Washington, DC. You will never find a more wretched hive of scum and villainy. We must be cautious")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Hoosier-Daddy

If you have a large volume of water available for cooling it’s called pump and dump. You use the water, it cools the heat exchanger and then you simply discharge it.

The water will eventually disapate the heat it has collected. Coolers or chillers are expensive to run and also require water treatment.


17 posted on 02/04/2015 10:24:07 PM PST by jcon40
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

To: Hoosier-Daddy

I’m probably missing something technical. But it sure seems like an obvious question to bring up for a laymen if one is going to report on this, right? Even if you just say ‘the authorities had no comment about what happens to the water afterwards. The experts we contacted are baffled as to the final destination of the water, and couldn’t even speculate.’ I mean if the point is to be outraged by this water consumption, why not spell it out if the water is just poured into the ground or whatever?

Freegards


18 posted on 02/04/2015 10:26:36 PM PST by Ransomed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson