Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: DiogenesLamp
Your Burke quotation establishes that marijuana legalization "has nothing to do with freedom" only under the baseless assumption that all marijuana use (including legal use) is "intemperate."

The term "Legal" in this context is baseless. Legality has become so cut loose from it's moral underpinnings as to represent no compelling argument.

The term "legal" in my parenthetical note was not intended as an argument but simply to clarify the breadth of the preceding "all." Or if you mean that you weren't talking about marijuana legalization at all, then what were you talking about - what is "intemperate" and what should we do about it?

135 posted on 02/06/2015 12:13:38 PM PST by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 131 | View Replies ]


To: ConservingFreedom
I'm just about tired of responding to you. I personally think this is all you are about. You aren't going to gain any political power through your endless diatribes, but instead I think your purpose is to feel like you are being affirmed through the responses you get to your baiting.

And let's face it, that is exactly what you are doing, you are baiting people to respond to your endless stream of pro-drug articles that you post.

I resent the time I have to waste to slap down your lies and propaganda.

234 posted on 02/06/2015 2:11:12 PM PST by DiogenesLamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 135 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson