The narrative develops first at the speech and then again over time.
Unfortunately, the point man would be Boehner, who made the invitation and who doesn’t have the stones to say what needs to be said. An actual conservative is going to have to carry that mantle.
But the debate will continue, and will be an issue in 2016. To truly hurt Democrats and show them to be the Islamist lovers they are, it’s going to have to be repeated and repeated, and at times when Republicans have access to media (i.e. in debates).
There’s more than legacy media to deal with too. There’s social media, which costs nothing and which has vast influence (just look at what’s happening to Brian Williams now).
Play the long game. Islamic terror is not going away as long as Democrats are in charge.
Good points.
It’ll take a lot of good people on social media to overcome the sheer volume of the bots purchased by the regime, and the paid agitaters.
Your point about the debates is important. At this point I have absolutely no use for a candidate who is too mealy-mouthed to say what needs to be said. If they’re too afraid of the treasonous media to speak directly and plainly to the people about where America is at right now then they are too weak to do the job. At this point, anybody less than a Winston Churchill is just not strong enough.
If Jeb is our candidate I will sit out this election, for the first time ever.