Magazine clip bullet holder thingy. They failed to provide "factual" support! Like that ever bothers these assclowns. If you simply review the messaging guide, you'll see where they usually end up going with their BS.
1 posted on
02/07/2015 9:04:53 AM PST by
rktman
To: rktman
2 posted on
02/07/2015 9:05:56 AM PST by
rktman
(Served in the Navy to protect the rights of those that want to take some of mine away. Odd, eh?)
To: rktman
I don’t use clips, just magazines, so this does not affect me. Still, it’s unconstitutional. This bill must be stopped by any means necessary.
4 posted on
02/07/2015 10:01:00 AM PST by
Pollster1
("Shall not be infringed" is unambiguous.)
To: rktman
As you well know...banning something and actually getting compliance with said ban are two entirely different things.
5 posted on
02/07/2015 10:06:41 AM PST by
Ouderkirk
(To the left, everything must evidence that this or that strand of leftist theory is true)
To: rktman
This bill will be dead on arrival.
It’s going nowhere.
To: rktman
My question is what is the ratio of home invasions by two or more thugs and Newtown type incidents.
9 posted on
02/08/2015 12:32:49 AM PST by
monocle
To: rktman
Ask them how many times they see a group of cops requiring more than 10 rounds to bring down a perp.
10 posted on
02/08/2015 12:39:08 AM PST by
Starstruck
(If my reply offends, you probably don't understand sarcasm or criticism...or do.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson