Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dallas59

It would seem to me that this person could be prosecuted under existing Peeping Tom laws. The Peeping Tom invades someone’s space and captures photos even though they did not consent to participate in the proceedings.

Isn’t this the exact same thing?

I’m all for giving the charged a fair break, but this guy knew he was doing something he should have been doing. This incident involving a minor should warrant the man a stiff prison sentence. He should also be required to register as a sex offender.


37 posted on 02/07/2015 3:45:02 PM PST by DoughtyOne (The question is Jeb Bush. The answer is NO!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: DoughtyOne

Well said.


38 posted on 02/07/2015 3:46:20 PM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne

“It would seem to me that this person could be prosecuted under existing Peeping Tom laws.”

He was prosecuted under Oregon’s ‘peeping tom’ law.

Now, suppose you were the school photographer that took a group shot and one of the girls crotch accidentally showed under her skirt. Would you send him to jail?


44 posted on 02/07/2015 3:51:08 PM PST by TexasGator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

To: DoughtyOne

There was acase, again in Oregon, where a man set cameras outside his minor(girl)neighbor’s bedroom window. Not illegal in Oregon!!!!!


71 posted on 02/07/2015 5:09:13 PM PST by gundog (Help us, Nairobi-Wan Kenobi...you're our only hope.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson