[Ken H]

I did not "distort," "failed to mention," or commit an "oversight, or a deliberate act of deceit to omit..."

Yes you did. I can't read your mind, so I can only speculate as to the reason for your dishonesty. I personally think it's calculated to distract from the point that nearly 20 years of looser pot laws have not resulted in deadlier highways.

You thought you had a nice 'gotcha' with this article and someone came along and spoiled your party.

[CutePuppy]

I personally think it's calculated to distract from the point that nearly 20 years of looser pot laws have not resulted in deadlier highways.

So the article which reports a large-scale study about the fact that "fewer Americans are drinking and driving; more are using drugs" and doesn't mention fatalities is a distraction from your later post about your unrelated theory of "deadlier highways" and not the other way around?

This is transparently ridiculous. Well, I tried to help, but I might have been wrong about giving you the benefit of the doubt regarding your sincerity of "not understanding" the basic concepts and issues.