Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cyclotic
Using SWAT to serve a warrant or to raid a poker game at a senior citizens home is bully behavior and improper use of resources.

Every little police force gets federal grant money and weapons to have their own SWAT unit. I would vote for SWAT to be only attached to the state police, and local agencies having to request them (and JUSTIFY the request!).

46 posted on 02/11/2015 7:25:40 AM PST by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625

Right on


52 posted on 02/11/2015 9:15:50 AM PST by cyclotic (Join America's premier outdoor adventure association for boys-traillifeusa.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625
Every little police force gets federal grant money and weapons to have their own SWAT unit. I would vote for SWAT to be only attached to the state police, and local agencies having to request them (and JUSTIFY the request!).

State or county level. Sheriff's office maybe. But there's no reason for any city (and every city) to have their own SWAT team.
69 posted on 02/11/2015 5:08:58 PM PST by Svartalfiar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson