To: xzins; P-Marlowe; trisham
The new thinking said cohabitation wasn't really a problem. Divorce wasn't nearly as harmful as once thought. Promiscuity presented no clear and present danger to the family unit. Same-sex attraction was perfectly normal. Pornography was little cause for concern. Indeed, an entire industry developed around its spurious allure. The "new thinking" was actually a lie spawned in the fiery depths of Hell.
6 posted on
02/13/2015 11:24:21 AM PST by
wagglebee
("A political party cannot be all things to all people." -- Ronald Reagan, 3/1/75)
To: wagglebee
He’s Billy Graham’s son. I didn’t realize that when I read the article.
10 posted on
02/13/2015 12:09:08 PM PST by
trisham
(Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
To: wagglebee; P-Marlowe; trisham
The 'new thinking' is as an old chaplain friend used to say, "stinkin' thinkin'".
Such changes in the past have brought the culture to such a destructive place. If our people and our justices would just try to envision the culture that will transpire with the advent of same-sex marriage. It will be all that has gone before in terms of weakening the nuclear family unit with an added push. I think it is designed to rid us altogether of the nuclear family, but my brain tells me I'm missing something more sinister.
My high regard for Jesus' own mother suggests to me that it will separate MOTHER and children, for they've already separated FATHER and children. And, indeed, if men pursue lust for men, then women are chattel or an afterthought or breeders. What did the men of Sodom do when offered Lot's daughters?
12 posted on
02/13/2015 12:19:24 PM PST by
xzins
( Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! Those who truly support our troops pray for victory!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson