Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Spktyr
Not so sure. Israel would have to be proven to have a weapon first and this documentation doesn’t seem to establish that they actually have them, only that they were trying to get them at the time.

anti-proliferation legislation was intended to prevent nations/groups from getting a working device. Therefore, admitting that Israel has an active R&D program would seem to me to be enough, especially since Israel is a non-signatory to international anti-proliferation agreements.

22 posted on 02/16/2015 1:50:07 AM PST by fso301
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]


To: fso301

Israel has never signed the NPT. What other treaty are they supposed to have signed?


23 posted on 02/16/2015 1:54:27 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

To: fso301

Also, this report is far less ‘conclusive’ than Robert Gates’ admission that Israel had nukes back in his ‘06 confirmation hearings.


24 posted on 02/16/2015 1:56:01 AM PST by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson