Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Climate change hampering world food production, say scientists (a 'food for thought' thread 8-?)
Yahoo News ^ | 2/16/15 | Jean-Louis Santini - AFP

Posted on 02/16/2015 5:20:37 PM PST by NormsRevenge

San José (United States) (AFP) - The acceleration in climate change and its impact on agricultural production means that profound societal changes will be needed in coming decades to feed the world's growing population, researchers at an annual science conference said.

According to scientists, food production will have to be doubled over the next 35 years to feed a global population of nine billion people in 2050, compared with seven billion today.

Feeding the world "is going to take some changes in terms of minimizing climate disruption," said Jerry Hatfield, director at the National Laboratory for Agriculture and the Environment.

Rainfall volatility, increased drought and rising temperatures affect crop yields, which means action must be taken, he said during a talk Sunday at the annual meeting of the American Association for the Advancement of Science.

"If you look at production from 2000 to 2050, we basically have to produce the same amount of food as we produced in the last 500 years" he said.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.yahoo.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Extended News; Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: climatechange; food; globalwarminghoax; hampering; noitisnt; production
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: NormsRevenge

After Hansen, Jones and Mann, it’s no wonder scientific PHDs garner little respect and even less credibility.


21 posted on 02/16/2015 6:09:40 PM PST by RetiredTexasVet (Benghazi Clinton killed 4 & injured a dozen as SOS, imagine what she could do as CinC.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
According to scientists, food production will have to be doubled over the next 35 years to feed a global population of nine billion people in 2050, compared with seven billion today.

Something is wrong with the basic math behind this assertion.

Why would you need a 100 percent increase in food production to feed a population increase of only 28.5 percent?


22 posted on 02/16/2015 6:09:41 PM PST by Iron Munro (Mark Steyn: “fundamentally transformed” is a euphemism for “wrecked beyond repair.”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jyro

I wonder where all the corn would be consumed if not for ethanol...


23 posted on 02/16/2015 6:10:23 PM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Rip it out by the roots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

There is a famine coming but it’s not due to global warming. It’s going to be due to government policies. Remember the pale horse of Revelation.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3258224/posts


24 posted on 02/16/2015 6:12:51 PM PST by Lake Living
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

If it gets rough enough, things will be much better afterwards. Those who are humble enough to do so will try gardening. It can be much more efficient in terms of using less space and water than farming operations done by global firms.


25 posted on 02/16/2015 6:22:30 PM PST by familyop (We Baby Boomers are croaking in an avalanche of corruption smelled around the planet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
The Population Bomb by Professor Paul R. Ehrlich warned of the mass starvation of humans in the 1970s and 1980s due to overpopulation.

Claim April 1970: “If present trends continue, the world will be … eleven degrees colder by the year 2000. This is about twice what it would take to put us in an ice age.” Kenneth E.F. Watt, in Earth Day, 1970.

Claim 1972: “Artic specialist Bernt Balchen says a general warming trend over the North Pole is melting the polar ice cap and may produce an ice-free Arctic Ocean by the year 2000.” Christian Science Monitor, June 8, 1972.

Claim 1989: “Using computer models, researchers concluded that global warming would raise average annual temperatures nationwide two degrees by 2010.” Associated Press, May 15, 1989.

Claim: “[By] 1995, the greenhouse effect would be desolating the heartlands of North America and Eurasia with horrific drought, causing crop failures and food riots … [By 1996] The Platte River of Nebraska would be dry, while a continent-wide black blizzard of prairie topsoil will stop traffic on interstates, strip paint from houses and shut down computers.” Michel Oppenheimer and Robert H. Boyle, Dead Heat, St. Martin’s Press,

Hmmm, scientists, not the most reliable when it comes to predictions.

26 posted on 02/16/2015 6:25:52 PM PST by Mastador1 (I'll take a bad dog over a good politician any day!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Eric in the Ozarks

Acres in corn had been dropping for decades before fuel ethanol. Dropping fuel ethanol would likely reduce corn acres at least 25% in a couple years. Corn acreage reduction would continue.

Pork, chicken and egg prices would likely rise because fuel ethanol currently subsidizes cheap high-protein animal feed.

Soybeans, hay, wheat, cotton, milo and rice would be gainers. Specialty crops would gain too.


27 posted on 02/16/2015 6:28:19 PM PST by jjotto ("Ya could look it up!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
According to scientists, food production will have to be doubled over the next 35 years to feed a global population of nine billion people in 2050, compared with seven billion today.

Obviously these "scientists" are not mathematicians.

28 posted on 02/16/2015 6:29:13 PM PST by P-Marlowe (Saying that ISIL is not Islamic is like saying Obama is not an Idiot.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Iron Munro
This is from the Department of Agriculture. They are politicized zombies and have been since the 1930s. They don't need no steenkin' maths.
29 posted on 02/16/2015 6:47:14 PM PST by hinckley buzzard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The media told us that 2014 was the hottest year on record.

Both corn and soybean crops were records in 2014 for the US.


30 posted on 02/16/2015 7:05:27 PM PST by Western Phil
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Well, if CO2 is increasing as much as the climate wild-hairs claim, then that’s GOOD for food production!


31 posted on 02/16/2015 7:38:48 PM PST by SuziQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

But, I want a famine.

There is going to be a famine. It will be from cooling due to volcanism or a meteor impact. People will have hungry children, and the vote will suddenly be much more conservative. Many dumb and lazy people will die.


32 posted on 02/16/2015 9:24:35 PM PST by Born to Conserve
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jjotto

I remember hunting pheasants on set aside land, now supporting corn fields.


33 posted on 02/17/2015 5:03:31 AM PST by Eric in the Ozarks (Rip it out by the roots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson