[so_real]

Ignores a truth: without the vaccinations, how many more cases and deaths would there have been? History suggests, the 100 deaths would pale before the count.



Actually, "the truth" is that measles deaths were reduced to less than 2 per 100,000 cases more than a decade before the measles vaccine was even created. I'm on board with vaccinations for truly life threatening diseases given at more appropriate ages that haven shown to be effective. But I am entirely unconvinced that current measles, mumps, and flu vaccines fall into that category.

[Bogey78O]

So at current population and past trend, there would be a “small” 700-800 dead per year... and of course an insignificant number of miscarriages, deafened, and brain damaged. While with the vaccine we see an incredibly large 100 dead!

So either a trifling 800 or a sizable 100! Hmmmm... Which would I rather, indeed.

[GraceG]

True, but the government and it’s agencies have the propensity to “sugar coat” the truth, while most all vaccines are beneficial, they always tend to push them while sugar coating the risks, however small those riskss may be.

I stay vaccinated, but I also do want to know all the risks.

Vaccines have a risk, even if that risk is .001% it is still a risk and I still think these things should never ever be made mandaroty via the “government power of the gun”....