[Mr. K]

APPEAL THAT DECISION

If this kind of takeover is NOT covered by the 3rd amendment then what is?

And give that smarmy defense attorney who called it a ‘red herring’ a good ass-beating

[OneWingedShark]

> If this kind of takeover is NOT covered by the 3rd amendment then what is?

I agree, but the judge's decision isn't entirely without merit: the third specifically mentions "soldiers" and so in order to be operative it should be proven that the police are soldiers. (This, I think, would be a good issue to let the jury decide.)

And give that smarmy defense attorney who called it a ‘red herring’ a good ass-beating

Well, it'd probably be easier to make a list of lawyers that don't need one of those than those who do. ;)