Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: xsrdx

Let me guess ... the Marine Corps decided on it’s own to give their men a new toy and the men were never consulted whether they even WANTED it or not and ... as it turns out ... the Marine Crps wasted its time and money ... have I got that close to correct ?


3 posted on 02/20/2015 2:00:53 PM PST by knarf (I say things that are true ... I have no proof ... but, they're true)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: knarf

The Marines insisted on an external safety. Glock politely declined.


5 posted on 02/20/2015 2:04:52 PM PST by Lurker (Violence is rarely the answer. But when it is it is the only answer.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: knarf

>>Let me guess ... the Marine Corps decided on it’s own to give their men a new toy and the men were never consulted whether they even WANTED it or not and ... as it turns out ... the Marine Crps wasted its time and money ... have I got that close to correct ?

Yep. A bunch of old people told young operators what they needed...when what they really needed was reliability and capacity.


7 posted on 02/20/2015 2:07:02 PM PST by Bryanw92 (Sic semper tyrannis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

To: knarf

It’s probably more related to the size of the pistol than anything else. Grunts hate heavy sh*t, and don’t use handguns much, so why carry a bigazz custom 1911. One could argue the Glock likely suffers punishment better and runs more reliably, but 1911 advocates won’t hear it.


9 posted on 02/20/2015 2:07:58 PM PST by xsrdx (Diligentia, Vis, Celeritas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson