Posted on 02/23/2015 7:38:22 AM PST by wagglebee
Judges today for the most part could not care less about the law, they are activists who took the position of judge in order to pass an agenda.
When you see Kagan clapping fairy boy during the SOTU then you know they are not fair or non biased.
See my #37. To understand the totalitarian mindset on the Left, you need to recognize that the principal motivation for wanting to create a new social order--whether you call it Communism, National Socialism, or an American "Liberalism" that seeks some form of humanist or egalitarian uniformity--is a deep & actual hatred of the cultural values which that "ism" attacks. To understand an organization like the ACLU, look not at their rationalizations--their specious verbal arguments that seek to make "tyranny" a "civil liberty";--but at what their successes actual mean to the basic rights of a people--including a people's right to enjoy the spiritual & cultural achievements of their forebears.
Understood on the anvil of experience, the ACLU is more like Ernst Roehm's Brown Shirts--albeit with a silk glove rather than a bludgeon--than anything remotely American. Note that they never stand up for the Second Amendment; even as they distort the First; never for the property rights of the people, even as they work with other Leftist groups to encourage the sort of attack on property owners, such as the subject of this thread.
A few judges have developed a novel definition of ‘marriage’ that has never been recognized by any major society, and has been specifically and repeatedly rejected by the people of the United States, and have imposed this novel definition on the people of the United States. These same judges now claim that if you do not follow their diktat that you are being discriminatory, thus applying legitimate law to illegitimate and illegal judicial diktats. And other judges ignore law and follow these judges.
The word for these people is TYRANT.
The only fail safe is 'have to check you schedule, and get back to' the prospective client. Where this lady went wrong is being honest with a long time client.
People have been artificially conditioned to accept more and more limitations on their rights to make their own free choices in their own affairs. It is by this step by step imposition of limitations, that freedom is lost.
There is a major difference between doing something mischievous, intended to harm another; and simply preferring to do business with one person, rather than another.
Being honest is NEVER wrong. But perhaps you meant that she should have kept silent?
You prefer the lie by omission route.
However as the construction of the cake is a contract the lady should agree to make the cake, in exchange for the repayment of the national debt in cash.
It is foolish to assume that one of the parties in a contract is obligated to accept the contract unilaterally as dictated by another. The business owner has an equal right to not join in the contract. Ignoring the obvious to make a Constitutional ruling on homosexual marriage is illegal in any real court of justice.
This is WHY homosexuality was illegal, it is a mental illness that consumes the focus of the afflicted on reality.
Homosexuals are insane.
Because the whole “Christ vs everything else” is coming to a head.
Churches you better be prepared to lose you 501c3 tax status, then when you loose that and still refuse to marry homosexuals, then you will loose your church building and may end up in jail.
This is coming. The powers of darkness are way more committed than the children of light.
Nice try at mischaracterizing my post. To keep your mouth shut is an instruction found in the Bible, and if you are seriously trying to pin that idiocy of your post on me, try it with Jesus before Pilot and then before Caiaphas. Read your Bible more ...
I DO agree but this judge is confirming the same decisions reached in the other bakery case and the flower case: that your beliefs LOSE to their veliefs.
That’s why I think ,,,or would like to see someone...raise the argument that you cannot force a person to engage in speech.
But who knows...I thought there was no way they could coerce me to buy something I didn’t want....
Agree and the latest example was the TX judge who ordered for two homosexual women to marry yet the judge knew it is against TX law.
I don’t know about how judges should be removed enough to comment but surely some of these judges should go as well time limits on federal judges.
You can chalk that one up to the treachery of a man easily blackmailed, who was placed in a position of high authority. John Roberts is a dead-soul bitch of the oligarchy.
That’s what reprobates do, devoid of right thinking.
Agree . Right now we have those who call themselves Christian and yet vote Democrat, . We have the media, the Government for the most part, those who claim they are republicans or conservatives but are for drugs, open borders, homosexuality etc and then the left are all out waging war against Christians.
Christians who vote Democrat have fallen for the whole “collective salvation” BS. I don’t know where they can scripturally justify it, but it’s how they justify their political leanings - as if it is part of their “good works”.
The judge is an ass.
The communists did the same type of action in Soviet Russia. “You are free to be a Christian, but if you are then clearly you are not a very smart person and should not be allowed to be succesful by owning a business, being a doctor, etc.”
We are on a dangerous path and one that is going to be rough to abandon....
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.