Posted on 02/27/2015 5:22:22 PM PST by Altura Ct.
In an exit interview, the attorney general says his critics may be partly driven by race.
Attorney General Eric Holder plans to push, during his final weeks in office, a new standard of proof for civil-rights offenses, saying in an exit interview with POLITICO that such a change would make the federal government a better backstop against discrimination in cases like Ferguson and Trayvon Martin.
In a lengthy discussion ranging from his own exposure to the civil rights movement of the 60s to todays controversies surrounding the shootings of Trayvon Martin and Michael Brown, Holder also acknowledged that he felt some of his own struggles with Republicans in Congress during his six years in office were driven partly by race.
There have been times when I thought thats at least a piece of it, Holder said, adding that I think that the primary motivator has probably been political in nature
[but] you cant let it deflect you from
your eyes on the prize.
(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...
From commentor uncle thom...
For almost 150 years the United States has been conducting an interesting experiment. The subjects of the experiment: black people and working-class whites.
The hypothesis to be tested: Can a people taken from the jungles of Africa and forced into slavery be fully integrated as citizens in a majority white population?
The whites were descendants of Europeans who had created a majestic civilization. The former slaves had been tribal peoples with no written language and virtually no intellectual achievements. Acting on a policy that was not fair to either group, the government released newly freed black people into a white society that saw them as inferiors. America has struggled with racial discord ever since.
Decade after decade the problems persisted but the experimenters never gave up. They insisted that if they could find the right formula the experiment would work, and concocted program after program to get the result they wanted. They created the Freedmans Bureau, passed civil rights laws, tried to build the Great Society, declared War on Poverty, ordered race preferences, built housing projects, and tried midnight basketball.
Their new laws intruded into peoples lives in ways that would have been otherwise unthinkable. They called in National Guard troops to enforce school integration. They outlawed freedom of association. Over the protests of parents, they put white children on buses and sent them to black schools and vice versa. They tried with money, special programs, relaxed standards, and endless handwringing to close the achievement gap. To keep white backlash in check they began punishing public and even private statements on race. They hung up Orwellian public banners that commanded whites to Celebrate Diversity! and Say No to Racism. Nothing was off limits if it might salvage the experiment.
Some thought that what W.E.B. Du Bois called the Talented Tenth would lead the way for black people. A group of elite, educated blacks would knock down doors of opportunity and show the world what blacks were capable of. There is a Talented Tenth. They are the black Americans who have become entrepreneurs, lawyers, doctors and scientists. But ten percent is not enough. For the experiment to work, the ten percent has to be followed by a critical mass of people who can hold middle-class jobs and promote social stability. That is what is missing.
Through the years, too many black people continue to show an inability to function and prosper in a culture unsuited to them. Detroit is bankrupt, the south side of Chicago is a war zone, and the vast majority of black cities all over America are beset by degeneracy and violence. And blacks never take responsibility for their failures. Instead, they lash out in anger and resentment.
Across the generations and across the country, as we have seen in Detroit, Watts, Newark, Los Angeles, Cincinnati, and now Ferguson, rioting and looting are just one racial incident away. The white elite would tell us that this doesnt mean the experiment has failed. We just have to try harder. We need more money, more time, more understanding, more programs, and more opportunities.
But nothing changes no matter how much money is spent, no matter how many laws are passed, no matter how many black geniuses are portrayed on TV, and no matter who is president. Some argue its a problem of culture, as if culture creates peoples behavior instead of the other way around. Others blame white privilege.
But since 1965, when the elites opened Americas doors to the Third World, immigrants from Asia and Indiapeople who are not white, not rich, and not connectedhave quietly succeeded. While the children of these people are winning spelling bees and getting top scores on the SAT, black youths are committing half the countrys violent crimecrime, which includes viciously punching random white people on the street for the thrill of it that has nothing to do with poverty.
The experiment has failed. Not because of culture, or white privilege, or racism. The fundamental problem is that white people and black people are different. They differ intellectually and temperamentally. These differences result in permanent social incompatibility.
Our rulers dont seem to understand just how tired their white subjects are with this experiment. They dont understand that white people arent out to get black people; they are just exhausted with them. They are exhausted by the social pathologies, the violence, the endless complaints, and the blind racial solidarity, the bottomless pit of grievances, the excuses, and the reflexive animosity.
The elites explain everything with racism, and refuse to believe that white frustration could soon reach the boiling point.
Cheap and tattered though it be, the race card is all he has, so naturally he plays it.
Whining to the End
Projecting to the end.
His critics are driven by HIS racism.
Man, that’s a keeper!
In October 1988, Nobel poet Tony Morrison wrote an article in the New Yorker titled “Clinton as the first black president”, saying he was “Blacker than any actual black person who could ever be elected in our children’s lifetime.” What then is “black”?
When Time magazine’s Jack White calls Supreme Court Justice Thomas, “the scariest of all the hobgoblins”, saying “Washington seems to be filled with white men who make black people uneasy”, than what is “black”?
It should be more than clear now that race has become a liberal proxy for ideology. When liberals assume that anyone who is conservative Christian is “white” and everyone else is “of color” or “black”, they can then put on the mantle of moral righteousness. When a person objects to this meme, it must be “racism”. That of course, is a barefaced lie.
I cannot estimate the number of working age black males wandering around shopping and just hanging out I see on a daily basis. White men under 60 hardly ever-they must be at a job actually working!
bfl
Holder says he withheld info from Congress because
of his color, black.
Holder says he committed treason because
of his color, black.
Holder says he lied to Congress because
of his color, black.
Holder says he broke Laws daily because
of his color, black.
It does not matter Holder’s color, just his crimes
(which are systematically ignored by the corrupt,
EXEMPT, enabling Congress).
Most racially divisive administration in modern history.
5.5mm
Marxist is a race. The New Soviet Man.
It’s the red in his soul that annoys me.
I saw/heard the exchange and saw nothing wrong with it (although I have only contempt for him). He was asked the question and actually said he didn’t think very much of the criticism of him was on the basis of race, but mostly on the basis of politics/policy. I consider that an accurate assessment.
No We are not Racist!!!
We just don’t like COMMIES!!!!
The gun running, mass murdering RAT bastard calls us rasist? Moi? Really?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.