Again, not a single word to logically support your position. You continue to refuse to provide YOUR definition of bullying because you know the second you do I can rip it to shreds.
My point about the child is that you keep referring to him as innocent without a single shred of evidence that the child was not complicit in this case of tardiness or the previous 5 events that occurred since the beginning of the school year.
To this point your argument consists of “It is bullying because I say it’s bullying”, “It’s wrong because I say it’s wrong” and “If I say it’s true then everybody agrees that it’s true.” Not very convincing arguments.
I have repeatedly told you what “my” definition of bullying is. Again, and pay attention this time, it’s the one you’d find in the dictionary, if you knew how to use one.
And again, and try to pay attention this time, my “argument” has nothing to do with your understanding or lack of understanding the definition of bullying. It’s about the treatment of an innocent child.
Now, I’ve grown weary trying to explain simple truth to someone whose goal in life seems to be avoidance of truth. It is wrong for a teacher (yes, even your wife) to bully a student. I realize you’re never going to be able to grasp that concept. That’s okay. Everyone can serve a purpose in life, even if it’s just to serve as a warning to others.
Have a nice day.