I think it’s 50-50 - and I don’t trust Roberts, but King is a very strong case, and Jonathon Gruber’s video idiocy reinforces the King case since Gruber’s comments are part of the case.
The correct ruling is to toss Obamacare out; based on facts and law. Roberts tortured explanation from the last ruling seemed based on what he felt the sign of the times was; which is wrong on so many levels. So now he wants to protect his earlier ruling based on Gruber LIES?
"A foolish consistency is the hobgoblin of little minds" - Emerson