[piytar]

The challengers’ central argument in King v. Burwell is that the Affordable Care Act—the signature achievement of the Obama Administration and the most significant social legislation in a generation—must be given an interpretation that no legislator, no analyst, no journalist, and no pundit ever anticipated, aloud or in print, prior to its passage.

THAT IS A FLAT OUT LIE.

[Timocrat]

THAT IS A FLAT OUT LIE.

110% Correct. An absolute straight out lie. It was a deliberate act on the part of Congress to get around any Tenth Amendment objections.

[Norseman]

>>THAT IS A FLAT OUT LIE.<<

Yes, well when a columnist attempting a legal argument “sites” a case, he sort of loses credibility anyway, no?