Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Kaslin

Try as it can, the FCC’s jurisdiction would only apply to networks and servers and sites hosted within US borders, right? A site hosted in, say, Panama or Japan or India could still thumb its nose at them.

Considering foreign hosting alternatives for FR yet?


8 posted on 03/02/2015 1:20:10 PM PST by coydog (Time to feed the pigs!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: coydog

Fully expect accelerated efforts to pass a UN International “Internet Protection” treaty any time now, all in the name of:
1. thwarting terrorism / inciting violence, such as ISIS recruitment, via hate / radical / misinformation site information monitoring and filtering to label and restrict access, to “protect” us.
2. ensure privacy of world citizens to “protect” against improper use of Personal Information data - authorities will need to monitor PII / PHI data to ensure compliance.

3. protect vital infrastructure, such as banking, health, food, energy, government essential services - authorities will overtly need to monitor IP addresses.

Note, the USA ICANN ceded control of the internet
http://www.forbes.com/sites/emmawoollacott/2014/03/15/us-government-cedes-control-of-the-internet/

FCC gets control of the US internet last week.

Now Google is going to work with Microsoft and left orientated “Fact-checking” sites to “protect” US subjects from mis/dis-information.

Things are moving fast to usher in a Global Tyrannical Dem-Socialist reign.
Control information dissemination
Crash the dollar / EU
Reconstitute governments and economies to usher in a “A New World Order” (power & social structure), just as Bush I literally stated, 25 years ago...


12 posted on 03/02/2015 2:08:11 PM PST by MarchonDC09122009 (When is our next march on DC? When have we had enough?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: coydog

“Try as it can, the FCC’s jurisdiction would only apply to networks and servers and sites hosted within US borders, right?”

Wrong, because the foreign servers can be monitored for content and their IP addresses can then be filtered out at the intermediate domestic routers responsible for forwarding the IP packets. The end result would be monitoring and censoring of foreign located servers who are then unable to deliver IP packets to domestic American clients.


16 posted on 03/02/2015 3:38:04 PM PST by WhiskeyX
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: coydog; GeronL
Try as it can, the FCC’s jurisdiction would only apply to networks and servers and sites hosted within US borders, right?

Doesn't Google already censor search results for China and other oppressive nations?

18 posted on 03/02/2015 5:13:35 PM PST by a fool in paradise (Shickl-Gruber's Big Lie gave us Hussein's Un-Affordable Care act (HUAC).)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson