Replies

From his actions, we can deduce the general understanding of the meaning Natural Born Citizen. ARTHUR LIED BECAUSE HE DID NOT THINK HE WAS ELIGIBLE.

Sorry, but constitutionality, where "Natural Born" is concerned, is not about "Deducing" anything. In the here and now, in realityville, constitutionality for any subject in the US is described definitively, by the US Constitution and it's amendments, US Law, and SCOTUS rulings, period.

Your opinion, the opinion of most of the founders, your feelings about the matter are worthless until one of the processes DEFINED by the constitution is followed to change the current definition of "Natural Born" which as of this moment, does not require 2 US Citizens at the point of birth for a US Citizen to be "Natural Born" no matter how much you want it to be.

I'm not 'feeling' anything but using logic. So deduction is now forbidden I see. a-->b, a, therefore b. Why did Arthur hide a part of his history that made no difference?

NO ANSWER.

And the legal history on this topic is not at all extensive or clear. So your opinion is just that, an opinion YOU hope (or maybe feel) to be correct.