Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Well, thats because half of the court are rabid liberal partisans who don't give a sh*t what the Constitution says or doesn't say.

Thanks alot Orrin Hatch you worthless waste of a perfectly good suit.

2 posted on 03/04/2015 10:32:45 AM PST by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: skeeter

“Well, thats because half of the court are rabid liberal partisans who don’t give a sh*t what the Constitution says or doesn’t say.
Thanks alot Orrin Hatch you worthless waste of a perfectly good suit.”

You do know that the case currently before the court has nothing to do with the Constitutionality of Obamacare, right?


19 posted on 03/04/2015 10:55:51 AM PST by Conscience of a Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: skeeter
Our Constitution ISN'T EVEN IN PLAY HERE.. This argument hinges on WHETHER THE WORDING IN OBAMACARE MEANT WHAT IT SAYS IT MEANT, OR WHAT OBAMA WANTED IT TO MEAN. He funded States NOT in the exchange, which was IN VIOLATION OF THE OBAMACARE LAW because the LAW CLEARLY SAYS that shall NOT be done!

This case before the Supremes has NOTHING TO DO with the Constitution.

33 posted on 03/04/2015 11:25:00 AM PST by CivilWarBrewing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson