[liberalh8ter]

It sounds as though the Obama administration's attorney is arguing that despite what the law actually says, the correct interpretation in the case of ambiguity is whatever allows the beast to exist. I'm no attorney so I wonder, is that a valid argument?

[demshateGod]

This should have been open and shut. Once the lawyer said the ambiguity means this or that, the court should have said, “Oh, it’s ambiguous? Do you think a whole nation should be subject to laws that have ambiguous language?”