Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: E. Pluribus Unum
Who says this “Dianne Reynolds” account belongs to Chelsea? Why couldn't it belong to Hillary, since Dianne is her middle name? This account should be subpoenaed too.
38 posted on 03/05/2015 10:00:25 AM PST by deweyfrank
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: deweyfrank

This is just the first layer of the onion... There are certainly other domains that are less revealing than “clintonemail.com” that were employed for the candid communications.


43 posted on 03/05/2015 10:12:55 AM PST by polstar123
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

To: deweyfrank
Along with all other accounts on the server and the server itself. Gowdy should be in U.S. District Court now getting the warrant issued on an emergency basis with provision for immediate seizure by the Marshals and turnover to the Select Committee.



"The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized."

45 posted on 03/05/2015 10:18:06 AM PST by ConorMacNessa (HM/2 USN, 3/5 Marines RVN 1969 - St. Michael the Archangel, defend us in Battle!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson