Replies

To: Kaslin

I’m not against the kids having fun .. but there might have been another reason to stop the sledding.

If the snow is not that deep, sledding on it can damage the grass underneath .. causing it to die.

So .. maybe the rule was to prevent having to replace all that lawn .. by USING TAXPAYER DOLLARS.

Geeeeee .. I guess nobody thought of that.

5 posted on 03/08/2015 9:29:44 AM PDT by CyberAnt ("The hope and changey stuff did not work, even a smidgen.")

To: CyberAnt

No lawns in the Constitution. Plant kudzu.

13 posted on 03/08/2015 10:02:10 AM PDT by Paladin2

To: CyberAnt

Have you been paying attention to the snowfall in the DC area this past winter? They have a couple feet to work with.

15 posted on 03/08/2015 10:15:14 AM PDT by rabidralph

To: CyberAnt

Grass is replaceable. Childhood isn’t.

16 posted on 03/08/2015 10:27:24 AM PDT by PrairieLady2

To: CyberAnt

As the article says, it’s so parents won’t sue the city if their kid gets hurt on public property.

28 posted on 03/08/2015 7:29:47 PM PDT by Impy (They pull a knife, you pull a gun. That's the CHICAGO WAY, and that's how you beat the rats!)

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794