Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Iranian FM Zarif to 47 GOP Senators: You’re ignorant of international law
Jihad Watch ^ | 03/10/2015 | Robert Spencer

Posted on 03/10/2015 6:42:44 PM PDT by Rusty0604

How dare they try to get in the way of a perfectly good appeasement agreement? The audacity! “Iranian FM Zarif to U.S. Senators: You Are Ignorant Of International Law,” Tehran Times, March 10, 2015:

“ TEHRAN – The Iranian foreign minister on Monday reacted to an open letter to Iran’s leaders by 47 U.S. Republican senators who had warned Tehran that any nuclear deal that the Islamic Republic signs with President Barack Obama’s administration won’t last after Obama leaves office.

Mohammad Javad Zarif said the letter lacks “legal validity” and shows that the signatories of the letter are “ignorant of international law[.]”

“In our view this letter has no legal validity and is just a propaganda scheme,” Zarif noted.

Expressing surprise on how it is possible that the legislators of a country write a letter against their own president and government to the leaders of another country, Zarif said, “The letter by the senators show that not only they are alien to international law but even not familiar with the details of the their own constitution about the authority of the president” in implementing foreign agreements.

(Excerpt) Read more at jihadwatch.org ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS: internationallaw; iran; irandeal; zarif
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last
To: Rusty0604
Here's MY view of "international law"


21 posted on 03/10/2015 7:02:05 PM PDT by Jim Noble (When strong, avoid them. Attack their weaknesses. Emerge to their surprise. .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Shadow44
I was under the impression the Senate has a say in treaties.

His Imperial Majesty Barackula will soon disband that misguided body ...

22 posted on 03/10/2015 7:03:57 PM PDT by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

By sheer coincidence, the BATFE wanted to ban M855/SS109 ammunition.

Coincidence.

Gotta be coincidence ...


23 posted on 03/10/2015 7:05:04 PM PDT by NorthMountain ("The time has come", the Walrus said, "to talk of many things")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604
“International law,” isn't.

It is merely a very loose collection of expressed hopes. No country has true sovereignty over another in this area of “law.”

24 posted on 03/10/2015 7:05:51 PM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rainier1789

Yes.


25 posted on 03/10/2015 7:06:39 PM PDT by SaxxonWoods (Life is good.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

Stop worrying about what others think and do the right thing.


26 posted on 03/10/2015 7:07:36 PM PDT by jsanders2001
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

US Constitution, powers of the President
Article 2 section 2,
2. He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur;.

Iran has played into the letter writers hands stating that they believe Obama can unilaterally make a binding international treaty for the US.... with the senators who wrote the letter saying “no we have to approve it”.. see above


27 posted on 03/10/2015 7:08:10 PM PDT by tophat9000 (An Eye for an Eye, a Word for a Word...nothing more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: doc1019

Here is the pertinent clause (Art II, Section 2, clause 2:

2: He shall have Power, by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur;

note the word “present”. That’s how they slide crap through.

http://constitutionus.com/#a2s2c2

This is an indexed Constitution. I love it.


28 posted on 03/10/2015 7:09:08 PM PDT by matthew fuller (The ONLY Democrat candidate is a felony flawed candidate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: matthew fuller

The 222 rule..if Obama breaks it 3 time...is that 666?


29 posted on 03/10/2015 7:11:16 PM PDT by tophat9000 (An Eye for an Eye, a Word for a Word...nothing more)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000

He already has the mark.


30 posted on 03/10/2015 7:13:26 PM PDT by matthew fuller (The ONLY Democrat candidate is a felony flawed candidate!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble

Like!


31 posted on 03/10/2015 7:13:27 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000

Well Obama did say in a town hall meeting that , He is The Only Law


32 posted on 03/10/2015 7:14:42 PM PDT by molson209 (Blank)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Iran is now an arbiter of international law violations????


33 posted on 03/10/2015 7:17:42 PM PDT by terycarl (common sense prevails over all)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000

They probably figure Obama has no regard for our constitution anyway, and the people aren’t doing anything about it, so why not? We are being invaded at our borders and Obama is helping the.

What will the people do if Obama did get 2/3 Senate approval to give away ours an Israel’s security?


34 posted on 03/10/2015 7:18:32 PM PDT by Rusty0604
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: faithhopecharity

No Controlling Legal Authority!


35 posted on 03/10/2015 7:19:40 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: tophat9000

Sucks to not be a dictator, ah Obama?


36 posted on 03/10/2015 7:20:51 PM PDT by dila813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Rusty0604

Well this should get the GOP senators off the hook. Clearly, the people negotiating with President Obama were not aware of the political realities of U.S. treaty law. And they need to be schooled further!


37 posted on 03/10/2015 7:22:43 PM PDT by the_Watchman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: the_Watchman
Clearly, the people negotiating with President Obama were not aware of concerned about the political realities of U.S. treaty law.
Fixed.
38 posted on 03/10/2015 7:26:52 PM PDT by Bratch
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: dila813

And no enforcement mechanism


39 posted on 03/10/2015 7:32:56 PM PDT by faithhopecharity (Foolish people ... have eyes and see not)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: exit82
The next warning will be a mushroom cloud,...

Therein lay the makings of a deal.

40 posted on 03/10/2015 7:34:22 PM PDT by depressed in 06 (America conceived in liberty, dies in slavery.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-58 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson