Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: baltimorepoet

If any of what they say was actually “common sense” they wouldn’t have to constantly call it “common sense”.

Tell me what is “common sense” about banning cheap practice ammunition that doesn’t penetrate any more body armor than any other rifle ammunition, in order to “protect cops”, despite there never having been a documented instance of this particular ammunition ever once having been used on a cop and despite the Fraternal Order of Police, Bloomberg, and the Brady bunch say that banning it wouldn’t solve anything.


25 posted on 03/12/2015 10:08:27 AM PDT by thorvaldr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: thorvaldr

not only that but the national police organization said that ammo is NOT a concern to them- it is very rarely used against police or civilians


26 posted on 03/12/2015 10:11:53 AM PDT by Bob434
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson