Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ken H; Amendment10
Amendment10, I think Thomas was stating the practical effect of the interpretive scheme rather than approving of it.
57 posted on 03/15/2015 7:29:42 PM PDT by ConservingFreedom (A goverrnment strong enough to impose your standards is strong enough to ban them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: ConservingFreedom; Ken H; All
"Amendment10, I think Thomas was stating the practical effect of the interpretive scheme rather than approving of it."

Everybody in this thread, please accept my apology if my remark about Justice Thomas offended you.

Note that the reason that I reference Thomas Jefferson’s writings about the federal government’s constitutionally limited powers a lot more than I reference similar writings by James Madison is this. Jefferson tended to better quote the wording used in the Constitution imo, while Madison got a little bit too flowery at times. And that makes it a little more difficult to connect Madison’s paraphrasing of the Constitution to the Constitution imo, particularly when many low-information voters have been taught PC interpretions of the Constitution.

I clearly have same issue with judges and justices who don’t SHOW ME references to specific constitutional clauses and quote wording from case opinions.

Again, I tell such judges that’s fine if you say constitutional or unconstitutional. But please justify thumbs up / down with precise references to Constitution so I know that you’re not trying to pull a fast one. (I still cannot figure out how post-FDR era justices referenced clarification of Commerce Clause in Gibbons to justify PC interpretation of Commerce Clause in Lopez.)

67 posted on 03/15/2015 7:58:43 PM PDT by Amendment10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson