Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: maggief

“The emails have not been made public, and The New York Times was not permitted to review them. But four senior government officials offered descriptions of some of the key messages, on the condition of anonymity because they did not want to jeopardize their access to secret information.”

I saw that, too. So we have 4 fellas who are not only more partisan than they are respectful of their security clearance, but they are also too craven to put their name(s) down. I shudder that we have such men in DC.


20 posted on 03/23/2015 11:39:11 AM PDT by Noamie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Noamie

“Four senior government officials”.

Hmm. What constitutes a “senior government official”? Congressmen and committee staffers are not “senior government officials”. Nor are Hillary’s former aides, like Huma Abelin or Cheryl Mills. That leaves people at high levels in the White House or State Department. Why would they have knowledge about Hillary’s personal e-mails? What is their role in managing the response to the Benghazi Committee?

Obama is obsessively sensitive about leaks to the press. Who did he direct to talk to the NYT? Trey Gowdy needs to find out.


22 posted on 03/23/2015 1:08:47 PM PDT by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson