Honestly, wouldn't you expect a beloved Texas legend to do WAY BETTER than a "hold your nose" RINO candidate from Massachusetts who was the Godfather of Obamacare?
Evidently, you aren't seeing my questions so I'm going to make this very easy for you and repeat them in a list format. Heck, I'll even throw in some extra explanations of my original questions, just to be sure you understand. All of these questions are asking for you to explain your original statement to me up in #46. Until this is done, we cannot progress. I will let you make that call.
My questions:
If you want to address those 4 questions, I'll be happy to continue this conversation and maybe we can get somewhere.1. You’re talking about a 1% difference?
(This one is a no-brainer, so I will presume your answer is "yes.")2. Where are you getting those stats, because i didn’t know Cruz’s number was that high.
( Do you have a source for your statistics? Do you have a reference you can cite for this? On Hannity yesterday, Cruz said he took 40% of the Hispanic vote for the Senate race, which is rather high, especially when you compare that with Romney's 20-something% of the nationwide Hispanic vote. But hey, I don't want to confuse you, so again... Where did you get those statistics you cited in #46?)3. And what do Texans have to do with FR? I made a statement about Cruz’s popularity among Texans, not Mittens’ popularity among FReepers.
(Again, how are Texans related to Freepers in this context? Please make that connection in simple language. I'm sure I'll understand.)4. I said “is,” not “was.” You’re also mixing time periods.
(To be exact, my statement was: "Cruz is immensely popular in Texas, much more so than Perry could ever hope to be."
The word "is" deals with present tense. Present tense uses the word "is," not "was." I am talking about how popular Cruz is now, and you want to discuss his popularity several years ago at his Senate race. You know, this point ALONE nullifies everything you are saying to me. You realize that, don't you?)
If you don't (or can't) answer these basic questions about your original statement, please tell me why I should continue this discussion. 'Cause I just ain't seeing it.