Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: RummyChick

This is really unfortunate (and I don’t like her “policies” —like ANY FLOTUS should have “policies”) but I think this is the combination of using her “real” hair (w/a wiglet in the back?) being pulled back, the kitchen over head lighting (it’s a profession kitchen) and TV lighting. No doubt someone will not only be fired, but audited, deported or jailed.

I would guess (from hairline looking thinnish) that she has used weaves in the past (she can certainly afford top of the line) but that the “line” has ranged her real hair. I also believe she makes use of high end wigs.

ALL that said, somebody wasnt watching the monitors as this was being filmed, even an over head light correction would have made her visible.


25 posted on 03/25/2015 5:54:09 AM PDT by PennsylvaniaMom ( Just because you are paranoid, it doesn't mean they aren't out to get you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: PennsylvaniaMom

Ranged = damaged


27 posted on 03/25/2015 5:58:16 AM PDT by PennsylvaniaMom ( Just because you are paranoid, it doesn't mean they aren't out to get you...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson