That isn’t the point.
Take a stroll through any number of glass-front office park buildings around DC, and you’ll see literally dozens of the exact same operations.
Before the coup, CNN was lauding how “Sophisticated” the EuroMaidan’s “Internet Opinion Operation” was, and even showed the servers, and people online, in several languages.
Hillary Clinton’s “Clinton’s Civil Society 2.0 initiative” sponsored the Soros “Open Society”-financed “Tech Camps” in Ukraine leading up to Maidan.
This guy has posted this same BS over a dozen times now, trying to create an IMPRESSION, without ever once mentioning that EVERYONE is doing it. That’s simple hypocrisy, and he does have an agenda to pimp.
And protesters were out in Ukraine months before the LIE of the coup took place and the former President is wanted by interpol and pillaged the nation. Enough of the Putin supporters trying to excuse the rape and murder everyday of this illegal invasion.
Litvenenko calls Putin a pedophile, we might as well believe that too.
The mulit-billion dollar “civil society” industry is kept out of the mainstream news completely.
Until recently the sheeple basically were unaware of it.
So they did not know how it worked with State Dept and intelligence.
“Take a stroll through any number of glass-front office park buildings around DC, and you’ll see literally dozens of the exact same operations.”
Your statement is a false statement and a lie insofar as the United States has not invaded, conquered, and annexed the territory of a sovereign nation since the adoption of the Kellogg-Briand Treaty in 1928. Therefore, it is quite impossible for the “exact same operations” to have been conducted by the United States in which Russia has invaded, occupied, and annexed the territory of the Ukraine in the Crimea.
“This guy has posted this same BS over a dozen times now, trying to create an IMPRESSION, without ever once mentioning that EVERYONE is doing it. That’s simple hypocrisy, and he does have an agenda to pimp.”
What part of the previous quotation did you fail to understand? “To clarify, although the person being attacked might indeed be acting inconsistently or hypocritically, such behavior does not invalidate the position presented.”
Nor does the Tu Quoque or ad hominem you are using to suppress the discussion of this subject about paid Russian Internet Trolls “invalidate the position presented” by these news stories about those paid Russian Internet Trolls. Oh, did I mention, this discussion is about the paid Russian Internet Trolls?