But the reason for that is that NO ONE is forcing the Palestinian Authority to negotiate. They don't want negotiations, so they continually make up excuses to avoid it ... AND INSTEAD ... ask the UN and other nations to simply DECLARE IT (and without any conditions as would be required ... in doing negotiations).
Prime Minister Netanyahu (on the other hand) is committed to forming a Palestinian State, with megotiations and per his Bar-Ilan speech from 2009.
The problem is ... the world is just getting tired of the whole thing and they're going to just DECLARE IT anyway, even if it doesn't bind the Palestinian Authority to anything!
Obama Says US Considering Support of Palestinian State at UN [Netanyahu & Israel]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/3271959/posts?page=1
JNS.org – President Barack Obama said at a news conference on Tuesday that the US is considering the possibility of supporting the unilateral recognition of a Palestinian state through the United Nations as part of his administration’s ongoing re-evaluation of relations with Israel.
Late last year, the US voted against a Palestinian-initiated resolution in the UN Security Council that called for a Palestinian state with borders based on the pre-1967 lines. The measure garnered eight affirmative votes among the 15-member Security Council, falling just one short of the nine votes it needed to pass.
Obama on Tuesday continued his recent criticism of Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu in the aftermath of the latter’s re-election, saying, “Netanyahu, in the election run-up, stated that a Palestinian state would not occur while he was prime minister. And I took him at his word that that’s what he meant.” Obama made similar comments in an interview with The Huffington Post that was published last weekend, despite the fact that Netanyahu has reaffirmed his support for a demilitarized Palestinian state that recognizes a Jewish state.
“Afterwards, he (Netanyahu) pointed out that he didn’t say ‘never,’ but that there would be a series of conditions in which a Palestinian state could potentially be created,” Obama said Tuesday. “But, of course, the conditions were such that they would be impossible to meet any time soon.”
—
Obama is creating a CONTRIVED SITUATION ... that does not exist with Netanyahu. Of course Netanyahu supports a TWO-STATE SOLUTION, just as he’s confirmed in the last few days, per his Bar-Ilan speech, as far back as 2009!
This present situation is Obama LYING about Netanyahu (who hasn’t changed since 2009) in order to have a CONTRIVED EXCUSE to make a MAJOR POLICY CHANGE for the USA.
In the past, both Israel and the USA have supported a Two-State Solution by way of “NEGOTIATIONS” between Israel and the Palestinian Authority. NOW ... Obama wants to abandon the USA’s long-standing policy, and have the Two-State Solution “by DECLARATION” ... which means that nothing will be required of the Palestinian Authority, and they would not be required to sign off on the fact that all problems are solved, as they would have to in the Final Status Negotiations!
They want a “peace treaty” any of us that studies the bible know why; the start of Tribulatiom. The Muzzies think it will cause the rise of the 12th Imam who most think is the true Anti-Christ. Obama was just setting the pins and the precursor. Once Tribulation starts and the athiests and agnostics catch on that this was forecast about 2000 years ago we may have a few new Christians.
Peace to the UN means Israel’s surrender (and probable destruction)
The UN has a two state solution: send Gog and Magog against Israel.
“Final Status Talks” ie, the Final Solution talks.
The U. N...
It gets one thing right in 1948, and spends the rest of it’s existence trying to unright it.
The Arabs on the West Bank and Gaza could have had their nation 67 years ago. They could have had it any time since. They decided not to.
The U. N. can go straight to hell.
It lines up behind evil far to often for my liking.