Posted on 03/26/2015 7:14:48 PM PDT by Red in Blue PA
In orders released moments ago, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals has ordered en banc rehearings in the landmark right-to-carry cases Peruta v. San Diego and Richards v. Yolo County Sheriff Ed Prieto.
From the filed orders:
(Excerpt) Read more at firearmspolicy.org ...
There’s no info in the linked item concerning the cases. Were the original 3-judge decisions 2nd Amendment friendly?
“We’ve found a way we might get around that pesky Constitution, order a re-hearing!”
In a revolution of Hosts throwing off the parasite, this court will vacate and the revolution will find these communist judges under their beds. The trial will have no appeal.
Thanks, I guess the 9th circuit will reverse and this will potentially be headed for the Supreme Court.
To provide some more detail, the original plaintiff (Peruta) was denied a concealed-carry permit in San Diego, under their highly restrictive laws. And California doesn’t permit open carry under any circumstances. The combination of the 2 effectively represented a violation of the 2nd Amendment, as it eliminated any possibility for a citizen to exercise their 2nd Amendment rights. Had the original ruling been allowed to stand, either San Diego or California would have to give - and you know who would win that.
The San Diego no-issue laws would necessarily become shall-issue, and any other jurisdictions with similar restrictions would have to follow the precedent - effectively making California as a whole a shall-issue state.
With the ninth circuit’s reputation as the most liberal in the land, clearly there are enough judges on the court that believe they can find some daylight here, preserving both the ban on open-carry, and at least something substantially less than shall-issue.
Yes, the original 3-judge decisions 2nd Amendment friendly, in that it relaxed requirements that county sheriffs could place on applications for permits.
mrsmith, you may be more right than you think - the 9th originally denied an en banc hearing requested by CA AG. Now, this en banc hearing is being held after voting on the sua ponte request of one (1) 9th Circuit judge.
isn’t the ninth circus the most reversed circus in the land?
Yes, but the dissenter in that case just recently became Chief Justice for the 9th Circus. Calgun’s forums think they are done and SCOTUS will not pick this up when it finally gets to them in several years. It’s going to get slow-walked.
There, fixed it.
Time for “Call to Arms” and begin the inevitable “cleansing” of our corrupt judiciary, as a start, and the preparation of “
cleansing” and “reconstituting” our government, IMO.
And California doesn’t permit open carry under any circumstances.
Actually there are exceptions.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.