An overturned conviction does not convince me that she’s not guilty.
Here’s a good site with much more info on this case:
http://themurderofmeredithkercher.com/Main_Page
And the controversy is why everyone wants to get in on the $$$. There have been ten to maybe a dozen books written about this case from all points of view:
"She's guilty as sin" to "a victim of overzealous prosecution by a corrupt prosecutor."
Sounds more like an innocent kid worried about how skipping work on that night would make her look, and therefore getting tangled up in a web under intense pressure. Am almost convinced of the innocence in this case.
A key reason for the tens of thousands of wrongful convictions in the US every year (verified by studies) is that the age old fundamental precept of “beyond reasonable doubt” is not applied. The “he/she’s got to be guilty” has convicted myriads of innocents each year, and that goes against everything that conservatism stands for. It’s one of the worst phenomena of modern liberalism.