Analysis? Supreme Court decisions and the Congressional Record aren’t analysis. The only analysis if footnote 6, the other 5 footnotes are not.
Where precisely is ANY reference to the singular powers of one congressional investigative committee chairman, like, say, TREY GOWDY, the object of your habitual wrath?
Stick to the point. Focus.
Then we can maybe run through all the OTHER diversionary rabbit trails you have opened.
Your bashing Gowdy is the subject of my complaint. I am not budging from that point. WTH, can you address it, or not?