“WTF? This guy didn’t read.”
The inclusion of “not” doesn’t affect the point the author is attempting to make. The author claims that the amendments Cruz proposed to the ‘comprehensive’ immigration bill would allow those currently here illegally to remain with certain restrictions on entitlements and with no pathway to citizen ship. The author claims this does not “respect the rule of law” hence the claim that Cruz position is contradictory.
Not trying to defend the author who I disagree with.
And since mass deportations are no where on the immediate horizon, and since this was an amendment to a bill with Harry Reid as Leader still, the author’s main point is still BS.