[9YearLurker]

Here is my post #45 in its entirety:

“It was idiotic backward of Pence and the state of Indiana to sign into law legislation that permits wholesale discrimination against gays.” (I actually had meant to have an “and” between idiotic and backward.)

The legislation is meant to enable retailers to discriminate against gays on religious grounds—and if Pence didn’t now realize he’d made a mistake with it, he wouldn’t be looking to change something he just signed this week.

You’re the one who introduced the phrase “one-sided discriminatory straw-man” and you did so in reference to my post guessing that Don-o did not support a return to Jim Crow, but instead to enabling retailers to discriminate.

[rollo tomasi]

"The legislation is meant to enable retailers to discriminate against gays on religious grounds..."

Yes and a Jewish person discriminating against a Christian if the so freely choose, a Muslim discriminating against a Jewish person if they freely choose and a homosexual discriminating against a Christian/Muslim/Orthodox Jew if the freely choose etc...

Does that completely line up with post #45? No, you posted a one sided POV then dropped the interracial straw man later on (Where case law serves as protection). Then you claimed some sort of facts which where 180 degrees out of phase with Indian's law and associating it with Jim Crowish one sided discriminatory actions that only protected the Chrisitan faction.

[rollo tomasi]

Sorry, Indiana’s law