“Clarify” probably means caving.
Ignore the shreaking freaks. No “clarification” necessary for freedom.
I’m not sure why a gay pair (they’re not a couple) would want a Mooselimb owned bakery to be forced to bake them a cake.
How do we organize a BUY-cott?
Someone has to list the scenarios where the law applies. In general transactions that are personal, should allow the proprietor to refuse service. Examples: relationship related photography, food preparation, art work.
Then the transactions where the law does not apply: banking, most food / beverage service, trades, employment, medical etc.
It’s one thing to be asked to not discriminate, it’s another being forced to celebrate something you despise.
The law should protect us from the latter.
What about the concept of being offended? Usually that empowers, but not in this case?
Lesseee ....
Can I go into a Halal deli and demand a hot pastrami sandwich?
Can I go into a GLBTQWERTY bakery and demand a Romans 1:26-27 cake?
Can I go into a black tailor shop and demand they sew me a KKK Grand Kleagle outfit?
I can’t?
Well then shaddap, whiners!
The Gaystapo SHALL NOT be prevented from pounding their opponents into the dust!
I can only imagine that clarification will help prevent courts from wholesale dismissing the religious defense in cases. At the moment, it is slightly ambiguous, with clarification it will be explicit. You can not compel someone to participate in something which is against their religion without a strict scrutiny of the issue. This goes far beyond the petty gay whiners who are throwing a temper tantrum over this.
What’s interesting is that this particular debate is sparking political conversations at our local brewery. Yesterday, not one person could defend the hysteria being aimed at Indiana. One rightly asked if an atheist must create and print religious tracts that are used to recruit people into religion.
It’s time the 20 states with these law retaliate and forbid any state fund to be spent in states that support advocating sodomy!
Haven’t paid too much attention to this, so maybe someone can clarify for me. Will this ultimately lead to Muslims evoking their rights to sharia law?
same as 30 other states and the federal government ?
It’s official.
We are now living in a country that is ruled by Twittermobs.
Connecticut Governor calls for boycott of …………….Connecticut?
I gotta go to work in 2 minutes….somebody here should post this—>
http://thefederalist.com/2015/03/30/connecticuts-governor-doesnt-understand-his-own-states-rfra/
I am boycotting the state of Washington until they change the name of their state. Although his slaves were freed upon his demise, he was a slave owner. That is wrong.