So if there’s no valid government, then is this scenario viable?
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/3276032/posts?page=2#2
How can there be government aggression when the people voted to void the Constitution by the election of an ineligible President? Men and women who used to hold positions of authority and standing choose not to recognize the will of the American people because they do not want to forfeit their positions of authority and standing are aggressive toward those who wish to fulfill the will of the majority and move forward.
The Founding Fathers declared independence from a foreign state after recognizing they had a God-give right to terminate obligations in the form of taxes to the foreign state without representation in the foreign state government. The King ignored the Founders and sent in troops to capture or kill the insurgents. The vast majority of colonist didn’t want trouble and were fine with the status quo. A few bargained with the Crown to settle the matter and resolved to continue a dialog as long as the matter was pending.
The Founding Fathers chose to establish a national governing document to be ratified by the states and defend themselves against tyranny.