So let me get this straight, you think that conservatives think of Antonin Scalia, Samuel Alito, Clarence Thomas and other originalist, textualist judges as “idiots?”
O.K., if you say so, then it MUST be true.
You’ll get no “argumentum ad nauseum” from me!
Of course not. I'm talking about most of the remainder, i.e. the vast bulk of the court system. Most people can distinguish between "Idiot" and "sane", and so would not count the above mentioned Judges among the idiots. They are part of the exceptional few.
O.K., if you say so, then it MUST be true.
More like Vice Versa.
You’ll get no “argumentum ad nauseum” from me!
Again, are you sh*tting us? All you ever do is trot out this irrelevant statute, or that irrelevant statute, or this judge saying this, or that judge saying that. You never argue the CORE of the debate. Your sole argument is "Judges said it. I believe it. That settles it." Ad Nauseaum is the mindless repetition of the same thing, and that is exactly what you do.