Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: SeekAndFind
RFRA SHOULD protect religious people who object to what a person DOES, not who a person IS.

As for me, I think a business or individual should have the right to choose not to interact with somebody, for any reason, and not be required to state a reason.

60 posted on 04/01/2015 3:57:14 PM PDT by PapaBear3625 (You don't notice it's a police state until the police come for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]


To: PapaBear3625

RE: As for me, I think a business or individual should have the right to choose not to interact with somebody, for any reason, and not be required to state a reason.

Well, that all went moot when the Civil Rights Act became law.


63 posted on 04/01/2015 4:01:32 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

To: PapaBear3625
As for me, I think a business or individual should have the right to choose not to interact with somebody, for any reason, and not be required to state a reason.

You are absolutely right, and this is why the libs always win. Even here on a conservative forum, many posters are taking the politically correct path so as not to offend-- basically giving libs 90% of the victory by saying you shouldn't be able to refuse service to gays, except in religious circumstances. Until 1964, you could serve or not serve whoever you pleased, for any reason you pleased. It is called property rights, it's your business, do what you want. Ever since we have been adding new categories to who you have to allow to use your business or services, and even who you have to hire. Instead of being so agreeable, we should fight them tooth and nail on every point.

87 posted on 04/01/2015 6:11:04 PM PDT by LambSlave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson