This legislation is every bit moral. As a matter of fact, not pursuing it is immoral.
To insist on legislation to ban all abortions is to insist on something unobtainable. To oppose this legislation by insisting on the unobtainable is to cooperate in evil by condemning those it might have saved if passed.
Where this legislation might be considered immoral is if it's author had no further intention of further restricting abortion by subsequent legislation once this legislation passed.
It’s only “unobtainable” because our representatives, including those who call themselves “pro-life,” refuse to fulfill the primary obligation of their oath, which is to provide EQUAL PROTECTION for the right to life of every person in their jurisdiction.
And if you have the governmental power to regulate mass murder, you most certainly have the power to stop mass murder.
Their alleged intent is meaningless in terms of the law.
The fact is, these bills grant an explicit governmental license to kill babies. All of them.
That's immoral.
That's unconstitutional.
If you surrender the moral basis, and the constitutional basis, you have absolutely no power left to stand in the way of abortion on demand.
Which is the primary reason the bloodbath has continued for more than four decades.