Well, if this is a “peaceful” program, nobody needs a “deal”, right Mr. Obama?
1 posted on
04/04/2015 3:57:30 PM PDT by
Olog-hai
To: Olog-hai
Ten bucks says that Obola promised to medieval knuckledraggers in Tehran “flexibility”...*after* having checked for microphones.
2 posted on
04/04/2015 4:04:48 PM PDT by
Gay State Conservative
(Obama;A Low Grade Intellect With Even Lower Morals)
To: Olog-hai
Both sides are playing for time. Both sides want Iran to get the bomb. It’s going to happen — and sooner than anyone wants to admit.
4 posted on
04/04/2015 4:10:00 PM PDT by
ClearCase_guy
("Victim" -- some people eagerly take on the label because of the many advantages that come with it.)
To: Olog-hai
"Foreign Minister Mohammad Javad Zarif says Iran has the power to take “corresponding action” and “will be able to return” its nuclear program to the same level if the other side fails to honor the agreement. …"
Just like North Korea.
To: Olog-hai
Iran could do just about anything. They have done it before.
7 posted on
04/04/2015 4:59:33 PM PDT by
Paladin2
(Ive given up on aphostrophys and spell chek on my current device...)
To: Olog-hai
does anyone really believe Iran has even paused in the development of their nuclear bombs? Who can be that foolish??
8 posted on
04/04/2015 6:15:38 PM PDT by
elpadre
(AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
To: Olog-hai
Very good point. And the Russians diplomat was correct when he called this a settlement not an agreement. The west had to settle for what Iran was willing to give.
9 posted on
04/04/2015 6:40:09 PM PDT by
justa-hairyape
(The user name is sarcastic. Although at times it may not appear that way.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson